Donskov Strength and Conditioning has built a niche over the years training hockey players. I would imagine my previous career in the sport (both at the college and semi-pro level) has led to the large influx of players and organizations entrusting DSC to train their athletes. I would also hope that my thirst for knowledge and professional experience in exercise science far surpasses my so-called career as a player. John Wooden once said “Don’t confuse professional experience with your ability to teach it.” Just because you played, doesn’t mean you’re a qualified coach. Although we take pride in our niche base of hockey players, I’ve never been a fan of what I would call “specificity overkill”, or sports specific overkill. Our job is defined, as Strength and Conditioning professionals not sport coaches. What’s the job of a strength and conditioning coach? Pretty simple; improve strength and conditioning qualities that can tangibly be carried over into competition!  Some qualities overlap regardless of sport. Some do not.

Specificity overkill or high-end sport training should be left for sport coaches, NOT strength coaches. Our job is to build athletes not definable sports skill/tactics (i.e. emulating sports demands on a BOSU ball).

ack1211

Don’t apologize for Strength!

 

Strength is the foundation of speed, power and change of direction. Our hockey players Olympic lift, squat (single leg), trap bar dead lift, bench press, pull up ect. You may think that many of these exercises are used in a variety of sports to enhance strength and your assumptions are correct! We train athletes! Below are the fundamental movements in our programming for players. I have bolded the movements that I feel are important areas of focus in training today’s athletic population due to postural adaptations/asymmetries.

Don’t apologize for building strength in your athletic populations! This cannot be accomplished by stick handling blindfolded on a BOSU ball with a resistance cord strapped around your waist!  Attempting to emulate tactical sport skills in the weight room (in my opinion) is a mistake. Don’t confuse skill set with strength and conditioning. One belongs on the ice/field, the other in the weight room.

  

The Case for “Sport Specific”

From my experience, there are two programming variables where sports specificity directly applies: Energy system development and movement capacity.

 

At DSC, the majority of our clientele are hockey players’, but I’ve always said, “We build athletes!” There are many ways to skin a cat (linear periodization, alternating linear periodization, Block Training) and multiple variables that can be manipulated when training athletes. This is the responsibility of the knowledgeable strength coach who understands the demands of his/her sport. Please leave the “sport specific” skill teaching to sport coaches. We all hold our desired sport in high regard, but I feel many times we choose to make things to complex. Let’s get our athletes moving well, stronger, more powerful and in better shape. I think we as strength coaches can all agree on that…. regardless of sport!

 

Anthony Donskov, MS, CSCS, PES, is a former collegiate and professional hockey player, founder of Donskov Strength and Conditioning Inc., (www.donskovsc.com) and Head Instructor/Director of Off-Ice Strength and Conditioning for Donskov Hockey Development (www.donskovhockey.com). He can be reached at info@donskovsc.com This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. .

 

Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/pages/Donskov-Strength-and-Conditioning-Inc/111694352189187

Twitter: http://twitter.com/Donskovsc