Anthony Donskov

  • Home
    Home This is where you can find all the blog posts throughout the site.
  • Categories
    Categories Displays a list of categories from this blog.
  • Tags
    Tags Displays a list of tags that have been used in the blog.
  • Bloggers
    Bloggers Search for your favorite blogger from this site.
  • Archives
    Archives Contains a list of blog posts that were created previously.

Hockey Sense: Installment #8:

Posted by on in Coaching Development
  • Font size: Larger Smaller
  • Hits: 212
  • Subscribe to this entry
  • Print

When it comes to programming for ice hockey we must ask ourselves…what qualities matter most in sport competition?  In other words, what qualities can we train off the ice, that make the most tangible differences on the ice?  What abilities make great players great?   In order to answer these questions, a good place to start is to look at some of the existing literature and attempt to see what correlates best with on-ice performance. 

 

b2ap3_thumbnail_image_20200618-160404_1.png 

  1. (Runner, Lehnhard, Butterfield, Tu, & O'neill, 2016)

Population:  Male Collegiate Hockey Players

Key Findings:  Only Vertical Jump (not standing broad jump, 1RM Squat or 40-yard dash) was associated with skating speed (fwd. and bwd. 90’ acceleration test). 

 

  1. (Burr et al., 2008)

Population:  853 Elite Draft Eligible Players (Combine testing as a predictor of hockey playing potential

Key Findings:  When eliminating goaltenders using multivariate modeling, peak anaerobic power (Wingate), body fat index and standing long jump appear to be most correlative to playing potential (as opposed to bench press, sit ups, and VJ).

 

  1. (Janot, Beltz, & Dalleck, 2015)

Population:  Division III Ice Hockey Players

Key Findings:  Vertical Jump, 40-yard dash, peak power % drop and 1.5 mile run time were the best predictors ofperformance.  In particular the VJ and 40-yard dash were the best predictors of repeat skate performance using the Modified Repeat Skate Sprint Test.

 

  1. (Farlinger, Kruisselbrink, & Fowles, 2007)

Population:  AA and AAA hockey players

Key Findings:  Both the 30-meter sprint and 3 hop jump (as opposed to VJ or BJ) correlated most with on-ice performance (35-meter sprint and cornering S Test)

 

When looking at the sport of ice hockey the research is debatable as to which off-ice motor abilities correlate with on-ice success.  Certainly, sample size, group demographic (youth hockey vs college hockey vs pro), testing methods and time of year all play a role in the results.  No doubt testing and monitoring play a major role as well.  With questions unanswered, coaches are left wondering what qualities to focus on.  In this situation a 1/n approach may be the best way to prepare the players for the demands of the game.  1/n simply means diversifying the portfolio.  In economics this done to offset potential loss while maximizing gains.  The same basic principle applies in sport preparation.  In the coaching world, the 1/n heuristic means diversifying programming to include horizontal force development, vertical force development, strength and power training within the weekly microcylce.  This covers most abilities that have moderate to strong correlations to on-ice performance on a weekly basis as it pertains to current research.  Thus, minimizing losses while maximizing gains. 

 

Yours in Hockey

Anthony Donskov

Last modified on
Follow Us